Ideology, Attitude Change, and Deliberation in Small Face-to-Face Groups

By John Gastil, L. Black, Kara Moscovitz. 2008

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b0e581959832c8e50f4302adbf0ff00b10e50c9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. G. Huber
2. D. Doherty
3. Conor M. Dowling
4. A. Gerber
5. M. Reed
6. Donald P. Green
7. James H. Fowler
8. P. T. Dinesen

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Huber
2. D. Doherty
3. Conor M. Dowling
4. A. Gerber
5. J. Kenter
6. M. Reed
7. I. Fazey
8. A. Nørgaard

Citations in the corpus

• Fake news and ideological polarization (2017, unknown): “(Brundidge, 2010, p. 682; Gastil et al., 2008; Huckfeldt et al., 1995; McKuen, 1990; McLeod et al., 1999; Price et al., 2002; Scheufele et al., 2004)”
• The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena (2011, background): “In a study of group deliberation, Gastil et al. (2008) find that discussion is less likely to result in group attitude changes in groups with members who are (on average) more Extraverted and Conscientious.”
• The Deliberative Value Formation model (2016, background): “It has been argued that all forms of deliberation and social learning are implicitly interactions about values (Goldstein, 1981; Gastil et al., 2008).”