The Rhetoric of Positivism Versus Interpretivism :A Personal View

By R. Weber. 2004

734 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5af4ab74cba25c2e83cc47eb486430f0c414a719

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

An Introduction to Design Science (2014, background): “Prior (2008) surveys the use of documents in social research and argues that by focussing on the functioning of documents instead of content, social science can make use of a broad range of methods of both data collection and analysis. There are a large number of introductory books on statistics and”
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review (2016, background): “Weber (2004) mentioned his colleague, Jorgen Sandberg, who has characterised the positivism that in positivism, person and reality are separate; objective reality exists beyond the human mind; research methods are statistics and content analysis; validity-data truly measures reality;…”
Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: trends and challenges (2015, background): “, 2011) and in many respects are not incompatible (Weber, 2004).”
Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research (2012, background): “Some attempts have been made to reconcile the differences and propose integrated views (e.g. Lee, 1989; Fitzgerald & Howcroft 1998; Weber, 2004).”
The Development of Empathic Perspective‐Taking in an Engineering Ethics Course (2017, background): “…viewed as partners (Borrego et al., 2009) as the interpretivist paradigm holds that “our knowledge of reality is a social construction by human actors” (Walsham, 1995, p. 376) and that “knowledge of the world is intentionally constituted through a person’s lived experience” (Weber, 2004, p. iv).”
Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Guidelines for Conducting Mixed Methods Research in Information Systems (2013, methodology): “…qualitative and quantitative methods in a single research inquiry) 3 that builds on a common scientific basis essential to advance and sustain the tradition of methodological diversity in IS research and to create a cumulative body of knowledge (Lee and Hubona 2009; Mingers 2001, 2003; Weber 2004).”