A mass-dependent density profile for dark matter haloes including the influence of galaxy formation

By A. Cintio, C. Brook, A. Dutton, A. Macciò, G. Stinson, A. Knebe. 2014

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT We introduce a mass dependent density profile to describe the distribution of dark matterwithin galaxies, which takes into account the stellar-to-halo mass dependence of the responseof dark matter to baryonic processes. The study is based on the analysis of hydrodynamicallysimulated galaxies from dwarf to Milky Way mass, drawn from the MaGICC project, whichhave been shown to match a wide range of disk scaling relationships. We find that the bestfit parameters of a generic double power-law density profile v ary in a systematic manner thatdepends on the stellar-to-halo mass ratio of each galaxy. Thus, the quantity M ⋆ /M halo con-strains the inner (γ) and outer (β) slopes of dark matter density, and the sharpness of transitionbetween the slopes (α), reducing the number of free parameters of the model to two. Due tothe tight relation between stellar mass and halo mass, either of these quantities is sufficient todescribe the dark matter halo profile including the effects o f baryons. The concentrationof thehaloes in the hydrodynamicalsimulations is consistent with N-body expectations up to MilkyWay mass galaxies, at which mass the haloes become twice as concentrated as compared withpure dark matter runs.This mass dependent density profile can be directly applied t o rotation curve data ofobserved galaxies and to semi analytic galaxy formation models as a significant improvementover the commonly used NFW profile.Key words:cosmology: dark matter galaxies: evolution - formation - hydrodynamics methods:N-bodysimulation

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5aea0c4525c92f2f2877628179c6a32a5295795d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Volker Springel
  3. James S. Bullock
  4. C. Faucher-Giguére
  5. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  6. Simon D. M. White
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. L. Hernquist

In Instrumentation

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. Volker Springel
  3. Simon D. M. White
  4. Carlos S. Frenk
  5. James S. Bullock
  6. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  7. L. Hernquist
  8. Joop Schaye

Citations in the corpus