Dark matter cores all the way down

By Justin I. Read, O. Agertz, Michelle L. M. Collins. 2015

218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use high-resolution simulations of isolated dwarf galaxies to study the physics of dark matter cusp-core transformations at the edge of galaxy formation: M200 = 107-109 M⊙. We work at a resolution (~4 pc minimum cell size; ~250 M⊙ per particle) at which the impact from individual supernovae explosions can be resolved, becoming insensitive to even large changes in our numerical 'sub-grid' parameters. We find that our dwarf galaxies give a remarkable match to the stellar light profile; star formation history; metallicity distribution function; and star/gas kinematics of isolated dwarf irregular galaxies. Our key result is that dark matter cores of size comparable to the stellar half-mass radius r1/2 always form if star formation proceeds for long enough. Cores fully form in less than 4 Gyr for the M200 = 108 M⊙ and ~14 Gyr for the 109 M⊙ dwarf. We provide a convenient two parameter 'coreNFW' fitting function that captures this dark matter core growth as a function of star formation time and the projected stellar half-mass radius. Our results have several implications: (i) we make a strong prediction that if Λcold dark matter is correct, then 'pristine' dark matter cusps will be found either in systems that have truncated star formation and/or at radii r > r1/2; (ii) complete core formation lowers the projected velocity dispersion at r1/2 by a factor of ~2, which is sufficient to fully explain the 'too-big-to-fail problem'; and (iii) cored dwarfs will be much more susceptible to tides, leading to a dramatic scouring of the sub-halo mass function inside galaxies and groups. (Less)

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28abe336b25aa4859eb9219401e988b3656f8545

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. C. Faucher-Giguére
  3. D. Keres̆
  4. James S. Bullock
  5. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  6. E. Quataert
  7. Justin I. Read
  8. L. Hernquist

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  3. James S. Bullock
  4. D. Keres̆
  5. C. Faucher-Giguére
  6. Justin I. Read
  7. A. Dekel
  8. A. Macciò

Citations in the corpus