Learning Policy Improvements with Path Integrals
By Evangelos A. Theodorou, Jonas Buchli, Stefan Schaal. 2010
69 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Reinforcement Learning
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Reinforcement Learning
- Sergey Levine
- Abhishek Gupta
- Pieter Abbeel
- Chelsea Finn
- Vikash Kumar
- Shixiang Shane Gu
- Ofir Nachum
- Igor Mordatch
Citations in the corpus
- Reinforcement Learning and Control as Probabilistic Inference: Tutorial and Review (2018, methodology): “The path integral framework has been used to derive algorithms for both optimal control and planning (Kappen, 2011) and policy search via reinforcement learning (Theodorou et al., 2010).”
- Learning dexterous manipulation for a soft robotic hand from human demonstrations (2016, methodology): “A widely used approach is to learn the parameters of a dynamic motor primitive [10] (DMP) with relative entropy policy search [11] or PI2 [12].”
- Black-Box Policy Search with Probabilistic Programs (2015, background): “ally weighted cost-to-go is known as risk-sensitive optimal control [van den Broek et al., 2010]. Path integral approaches have been applied to reinforcement learning problems in a number of studies [Theodorou et al., 2007, Theodorou and Todorov, 2012, Azar and Kappen, 2012]. Related approaches [Raw”
- Combining the benefits of function approximation and trajectory optimization (2014, unknown): “Such optimization is rarely used on real robots, even though model-free methods exist for adapting a given trajectory to unknown dynamics [34].”
- Perception, Action, and Utility: The Tangled Skein (2012, background): “Hence, this pattern of preferences is sometimes known as ambiguity aversion, and has been repeatedly demonstrated in a variety of paradigms (see Loewenstein et al., 2008, for a recent review).”