The social worlds of the unborn

By Deborah Lupton. 2013

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5aafb34abebadb1cb6fe4264e3639aa92e1a7977

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Reproductive Medicine

Citations in the corpus

‘What are you feeling right now?’ communities of maternal feeling on Mumsnet (2016, background): “…where often very personal and previously private expressions, for example of grief, receive very public attention, such as in the case of early pregnancy loss or stillbirth memorialised on YouTube (Lupton, 2013b) and Facebook pages for memorialising the death of loved ones (Brubaker et al., 2013).”
Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps (2015, background): “…future in which digital technologies are able to promote ‘patient engagement’ and encourage individuals to monitor their bodies in the interests of preventive medicine and self-care, thus not only improving health and healthcare but reducing healthcare expenditure (Levina 2012; Lupton 2012, 2013a).”
Threats and thrills: pregnancy apps, risk and consumption (2016, unknown): “…administered through a scrutinising public gaze depicting pregnant women as fragile and as in critical need of intervention, especially to negotiate risks – before a baby is even born – viewed as calculable and preventable (Burton-Jeangros, 2011; Lupton, 2012, 2013; Warren & Brewis, 2004).”
The datafied child: The dataveillance of children and implications for their rights (2017, background): “The sharing on social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube of the first foetal ultrasound image is one of the ways in which parents now publicly announce the new pregnancy (Leaver, 2016; Lupton, 2013).”