Using social-psychology models to understand farmers’ conservation behaviour

By J. Beedell, T. Rehman. 2000

532 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5aa35885c113a9e2ff87934139ad251d30243265

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

In Small Animals

Citations in the corpus

Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria:Farmer types and their rationale (2005, background): “The ability to reach this policy goal depends on the willingness of farmers to participate in the program and implement changes on their farm (Morris and Potter, 1995; Wilson, 1997; Beedell and Rehman, 2000; McGregor et al., 2001).”
Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter (2013, background): “Sociopsychological models of social cognitive behavior are useful in this regard and one in particular, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB; Ajzen 1991), dominates the literature (e.g. Beedell & Rehman 2000; Burton 2004a).”
Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri-environmental Schemes (2008, background): “Yet, as a number of commentators have observed, to ensure that improvements are widespread and permanent it is essential that farmers not only make subsidised environmental improvements, but that these are accompanied by a major attitudinal shift (Morris and Potter 1995; Beedell and Rehman 2000; Wil”
Measuring Responsible Environmental Behavior: Self-Reported and Other-Reported Measures and Their Differences in Testing a Behavioral Model (2011, methodology): “This study chose TPB as the model to be tested because it is a theoretical model widely applied in the prediction of REB (e.g., Beedell & Rehman, 2000; Kaiser & Gutscher, 2003; Kaiser, Wölfing, & Fuhrer, 1999; Oreg & Katz-Gerro, 2006), including environmental studies in Taiwan (e.g., Lam, 1999).”
Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science (2004, background): “Other researchers also have found measures of environmental ideology related to proenvironmental stances or intentions (Beedell and Rehman 2000; Corbett 2002; Grob 1995; Trumbo and O’Keefe 2000).”
Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism (2008, unknown): “…(Taylor & Todd, 1995), energy use (Harland, Staats, & Wilke, 1999), water conservation (Harland et al., 1999; Kantola, Syme, & Campbell, 1982), and the adoption of sustainable agriculture practices (e.g., Beedell & Rehman, 1999, 2000; Carr & Tait, 1991; Fielding, Terry, Masser, & Hogg, 2008, 2005).”
What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis (2015, background): “…factors influencing farmers to adopt AESs, focused on socioeconomic and structural characteristics, while some more recent work on farmers’ behaviour has been based on principles of social psychology and notions of social capital (Beedell and Rehman, 2000, Falconer, 2000; Defrancesco et al., 2008).”
Conservation and human behaviour: lessons from social psychology. (2010, background): “Subjective norms were important in predicting pro-conservation behaviours such as on-farm forestry (Zubair and Garforth 2006), on-farm conservation behaviours (including hedgerow management and tree planting) (Beedell and Rehman 2000), obeying boating speed limits in manatee (Trichechus manatus) are”