Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science
By J. Corbett, J. L. Durfee. 2004
301 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c8e937abb42fc66e2b90194b5ae454178766f00
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Literature and Literary Theory
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content From 1988 to 2014 (2019, background): “Presenting a scientific consensus as a debate confuses the public on the state of the science and, in the case of climate change, possibly reduces support for climate action (Friedman et al., 1999; Corbett and Durfee, 2004; Koehler, 2016; McCright et al., 2016).”
- The Effects of Uncertainty Frames in Three Science Communication Topics (2019, background): “…to date have directly compared the effects of different uncertainty types to each other (Binder, Hillback, & Brossard, 2016; Clarke et al., 2015; Corbett & Durfee, 2004; Kuhn, 2000; Rabinovich & Morton, 2012), but each is limited by methodological and conceptual issues, and none of them…”
- Media Literacy as a Key Strategy Toward Improving Public Acceptance of Climate Change Science (2011, background): “Laypeople typically view all scientific viewpoints as equally valid, and therefore naturally value a “skeptical scientist’s viewpoint,” which also resonates with the desire to maintain the status quo until uncertainty is resolved (Corbett and Durfee 2004).”