UV-CONTINUUM SLOPES OF >4000 z ∼ 4–8 GALAXIES FROM THE HUDF/XDF, HUDF09, ERS, CANDELS-SOUTH, AND CANDELS-NORTH FIELDS

By R. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, P. Oesch, I. Labbé, P. V. van Dokkum, M. Trenti, M. Franx, R. Smit, V. González, D. Magee. 2013

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We measure the UV-continuum slope β for over 4000 high-redshift galaxies over a wide range of redshifts z ∼ 4–8 and luminosities from the HST HUDF/XDF, HUDF09-1, HUDF09-2, ERS, CANDELS-N, and CANDELS-S data sets. Our new β results reach very faint levels at z ∼ 4 (−15.5 mag: ), z ∼ 5 (−16.5 mag: ), and z ∼ 6 and z ∼ 7 (−17 mag: ). Inconsistencies between previous studies led us to conduct a comprehensive review of systematic errors and develop a new technique for measuring β that is robust against biases that arise from the impact of noise. We demonstrate, by object-by-object comparisons, that all previous studies, including our own and those done on the latest HUDF12 data set, suffered from small systematic errors in β. We find that after correcting for the systematic errors (typically Δβ ∼ 0.1–0.2) all β results at z ∼ 7 from different groups are in excellent agreement. The mean β we measure for faint (−18 mag: ) z ∼ 4, z ∼ 5, z ∼ 6, and z ∼ 7 galaxies is −2.03 ± 0.03 ± 0.06 (random and systematic errors), −2.14 ± 0.06 ± 0.06, −2.24 ± 0.11 ± 0.08, and −2.30 ± 0.18 ± 0.13, respectively. Our new β values are redder than we have reported in the past, but bluer than other recent results. Our previously reported trend of bluer β's at lower luminosities is confirmed, as is the evolution to bluer β's at high redshifts. β appears to show only a mild luminosity dependence faintward of MUV, AB ∼ −19 mag, suggesting that the mean β asymptotes to ∼−2.2 to −2.4 for faint z ⩾ 4 galaxies. At z ∼ 7, the observed β's suggest non-zero, but low dust extinction, and they agree well with values predicted in cosmological hydrodynamical simulations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/79c76a6b42311d0f565ce99ad688a7ddb6ac79d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. Richard S. Ellis
  4. R. Somerville
  5. C. Conroy
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. P. V. van Dokkum
  8. M. Franx

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. R. Bouwens
  2. P. Oesch
  3. J. Dunlop
  4. G. Illingworth
  5. D. Stark
  6. I. Labbé
  7. M. Ouchi
  8. R. McLure

In Instrumentation

  1. C. Conroy
  2. Richard S. Ellis
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. M. Franx
  5. Christopher J. Conselice
  6. R. Somerville
  7. R. Bouwens
  8. R. Dav'e

Citations in the corpus