Wanted: A Barcode for Plants

By E. Pennisi. Science, 2007

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multiple Multilocus DNA Barcodes from the Plastid Genome Discriminate Plant Species Equally Well (2008, methodology): “, the competing proposals reviewed in [12]).”
Plastid genome sequencing, comparative genomics, and phylogenomics: Current status and prospects (2010, background): “Several research groups have proposed different plastid regions/combinations as their preferred barcodes, but no consensus has emerged (e.g. Pennisi, 2007; Erickson et al., 2008; Fazekas et al., 2008; Hollingsworth et al., 2009; Kress et al., 2009).”
Evaluation of 10 plant barcodes in Bryophyta (Mosses) (2010, background): “Several proposed combinations of loci have been summarized by Pennisi (2007).”
Plant DNA barcoding: from gene to genome (2015, unknown): “, 2007) and matK + atpF-atpH + psbK-psbI or matK + atpFatpH + trnH-psbA (Pennisi, 2007).”
Validation of the ITS2 Region as a Novel DNA Barcode for Identifying Medicinal Plant Species (2010, background): “Altogether, although no single plant marker has been found that works as well as the COI in animals, several markers of the plastid genome, such as psbA-trnH, matK, rbcL and rpoC1, have shown superior qualities as DNA barcodes relative to accD, ndhJ and rpoB [9,13,18,22,23] (Fig.”