Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Depression–Anxiety–Stress Scales in Depressed and Anxious Patients
By Ian P. Clara, B. Cox, M. Enns. 2001
461 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a42b29170d2c3afe31ddf7f1ce9bdf7f1c6ccde
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- M. Kefeli
- M. Boysan
- A. Yıldırım
- Rose Claudia Batistelli Vignola
- A. M. Tucci
- Agathi Lakioti
- M. Galanakis
- A. Stalikas
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- P. Norton
- Julie D. Henry
- John R. Crawford
- M. Kefeli
- M. Boysan
- A. Yıldırım
- Rose Claudia Batistelli Vignola
- A. M. Tucci
Citations in the corpus
- The Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. (2003, background): “To date, four studies have directly tested the construct validity of the DASS (Antony et al., 1998; Brown et al., 1997; Clara, Cox, & Enns, 2001; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995).”
- Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS) (2005, unknown): “Of these, 62.9% were single, 25.7% were married or living with a partner and 11.4% were divorced or separated; 42.9% were unemployed.”
- The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. (2005, methodology): “For the DASS-21, Antony et al. reported substantially lower between – than within – construct correlations, and in two independent psychiatric samples, the DASS-21 was associated with very good reliability estimates (Antony et al., 1998; Clara et al., 2001).”
- Desire for Control, Sense of Control and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms (2007, background): “The 21 item version has been found to have internal consistency and concurrent validity in the acceptable to excellent ranges (Antony, Bieling, Cox, Enns, & Swinson, 1998; Clara, Cox, & Enns, 2001 ).”
- Letting Go: Mindfulness and Negative Automatic Thinking (2008, unknown): “Several studies attest to the reliability and validity of this scale and its full-form (42-item) counterpart (Antony, Bieling, Cox, Enns, & Swinson, 1998; Brown, Chorpita, Korotitsch, & Barlow, 1997; Clara, Cox, & Enns, 2001; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995a, b).”
- Adaptation and validation of the depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS) to Brazilian Portuguese. (2014, result): “Other studies supported favorable psychometric properties of the DASS when applied to adults with anxiety and/or mood disorders (Antony et al., 1998; Brown et al., 1997; Clara et al., 2001; Crawford and Henry, 2005); Covic et al., 2012).”
- Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21): Psychometric analysis across four racial groups (2007, background): “Indeed, none of the major published psychometric analyses of the DASS (Antony et al, 1998 ; Brown et al, 1997 ; Clara, Cox, & Enns, 2001 ; Lovibond, 1998 ; Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995b) report the ethnic or racial breakdown of their samples.”
- The Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples. (2015, background): “Overall, the results from confirmative factor analyses (CFAs) supported the original three-factor structure [1,7,10,11,13], and only a few alternative solutions have been reported [7,12].”
- Psychometric Properties of the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Greek Sample (2018, background): “Τhe Depression and Anxiety scales of the DASS-21 have been shown to discriminate adequately between clinical and nonclinical populations as well as between diagnostic groups, showing good concurrent validity (Antony et al., 1998; Bados et al., 2005; Bottesi et al., 2015; Clara et al., 2001; Gloster ”
- Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) (2018, result): “As such, Clara, Cox, and Enns (2001) compared a uniform model with the original three-factor and second-order three-factor models and reported that three-factor models outperformed one-factor solution.”