Efference copy and corollary discharge: implications for thinking and its disorders.

By I. Feinberg. 1978

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, background): “A prominent theory of AVHs holds that they stem from misattribution of inner speech to an external source (Bentall, 1990; Feinberg, 1978; Frith, 1992).”
The perceptual characteristics of voice-hallucinations in deaf people: insights into the nature of subvocal thought and sensory feedback loops. (2005, methodology): “The subvocal thought hypothesis evolved from earlier theories of motor processing.(46,47) In”
Electrophysiological evidence of corollary discharge dysfunction in schizophrenia during talking and thinking. (2004, background): “One of the principal motivations of this study was to examine the effects of corollary discharge which according to existing theory should be activated by talking (Curio et al., 2000) more in controls than in schizophrenic patients (Feinberg, 1978; Feinberg & Guazzelli, 1999; Frith & Done, 1989).”
Schizophrenia, Dopamine and the Striatum: From Biology to Symptoms (2019, background): “The possibility, therefore, that disruption of efference copy mechanisms could contribute to passivity phenomena has long been suggested [86].”
Redrawing the Map and Resetting the Time: Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2003, methodology): “Following Feinberg (1978), Frith applies an explanation developed in an analysis of the self-monitoring of motor action to the analysis of mental experience.”
Introduction: Pathologies of belief (2000, background): “One of the most important ideas in recent research on schizophrenia has been that aspects of our experience of thought and agency may be underpinned by mechanisms of self-monitoring and particularly by comparisons that involve efference copies (Feinberg, 1978; Frith, 1992, ch. 5).”
The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis (2018, background): “Another influential theory of psychosis, the comparator model, suggested impaired predictive signaling as a key mechanism underlying hallucinations (49) and later so-called passivity phenomena, such as the experience of one’s actions or thoughts being externally controlled (50).”
Neurophysiological studies of auditory verbal hallucinations. (2012, background): “as efference copy, that tag those percepts as coming from self.(37) The lack of EEG theta band coherence (hypoconnectivity) between frontal and temporal lobes during talking has been associated with a tendency to hallucinate in patients with schizophrenia,(41) and fMRI hyperconnectivity within the c”
The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception (2004, background): “1983; 1997), and even psychiatry, where it is postulated that a perturbation of the CDEC system may underlie the positive symptoms of schizophrenia (Blakemore et al. 2002; Feinberg 1978).”
The role of prediction in social neuroscience (2012, background): “A mismatch, i.e., a discrepancy between the predictive forward model and the actual sensory feedback, can have pathological consequences, particularly relevant to schizophrenia and pathological abnormalities in ownership of action (Feinberg, 1978).”
Computational principles of sensorimotor control that minimize uncertainty and variability (2007, unknown): “Thishasled tothesuggestionthatschizophreniaresultsinpartfrom adeﬁcitinpredictingthesensoryconsequencesofone’s actions(Feinberg,1978;Frith,1992;Frith et al. 2000).”