The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict
By T. Josling. 2006
354 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a0da63179349c6016d4389101fe7f4c31db9a38
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Plant Science
- L. Menapace
- G. Moschini
- Mara Giua
- C. Cocklin
- Fabrizio de Filippis
- D. McFadden
- R. Teuber
- C. Vaquero‐Piñeiro
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Geographical Indications and the Competitive Provision of Quality in Agricultural Markets (2008, neutral): “Thus, it may be desirable to explore the international trade implications of the expanding reach of GIs, addressing explicitly the current WTO negotiation.”
- Consumers' and producers' expectations towards geographical indications Empirical evidence for a German case study (2011, background): “However, trademarks are individually owned rights whilst geographical indications can be considered as club goods (Josling, 2006).”
- Geographical Indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness (2021, background): “Other studies have focused on their link with the French notion of terroir (Cross et al., 2011; Josling, 2006), which is defined as a delimited geographical space where a collective tacit know-how has been constructed over the years as a culmination of informal interactions between natural and…”
- Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm reputation (2012, background): “…is that the quality attributes of the goods they identify are considered to be inherently linked to the nature of the geographic location in which production takes place (e.g., climate conditions, soil composition, local knowledge), i.e., to the notion of “ terroir ” (Barham 2003; Josling 2006).”
- A Meta-Analysis of Geographical Indication Food Valuation Studies: What Drives the Premium for Origin-Based Labels? (2013, background): “Large meta-analytical studies are therefore rare in our field: Lusk et al. (2005) compiled twenty-five studies and seventy-six observations (WTP for GM foods), Richardson and Loomis (2009) compiled thirty-one studies and sixty-seven observations (WTP for endangered species), and Murphy et al. (2005)”
- Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia (2009, background): “against the EU’s regime for the protection of GIs withmixed success (Handler, 2006; Josling, 2006).”