Geographical Indications and the Competitive Provision of Quality in Agricultural Markets

By G. Moschini, L. Menapace, D. Pick. 2008

280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3f64ea4af033beb8a1f367362522791b4dccfa75

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Olivier Bonroy
2. Christos Constantatos
3. Mara Giua
4. R. Crescenzi
5. L. Menapace
6. G. Moschini

In Plant Science

1. Olivier Bonroy
2. Christos Constantatos
3. Mara Giua
4. Fabrizio de Filippis
5. C. Vaquero‐Piñeiro
6. R. Crescenzi
7. L. Menapace
8. G. Moschini

In Strategy and Management

1. Olivier Bonroy
2. Christos Constantatos
3. R. Crescenzi
4. L. Menapace
5. G. Moschini

Citations in the corpus

• Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm reputation (2012, background): “12 The role of competitive markets and free entry into the GI sector is also discussed in some detail in Moschini, Menapace, and Pick (2008).”
• Geographical Indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness (2021, background): “Moschini et al. (2008) claim that the main beneficiaries of GIs are consumers, because they solve an information asymmetry.”
• On the Economics of Labels: How Their Introduction Affects the Functioning of Markets and the Welfare of All Participants (2015, background): “Moschini, Menapace, and Pick (2008) show that such marginal cost increases generate a quantity distortion on the high-quality supply, thus calling for public financing of the fixed certification cost.”