Urban effects on native avifauna: a review
By J. Chace, J. Walsh. 2006
1,695 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59e9ab49c268816f9090fcc27502d526cd187c5f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Salit Kark
- Kevin J. Gaston
- J. Tratalos
- E. Fernández‐Juricic
- J. Fischer
- Diederik Strubbe
- E. Matthysen
- John M. Marzluff
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals (2008, background): “(1) Is there a general pattern of monotonic decrease in species-richness with increasing urbanization? (2) Or is there evidence of intermediate disturbance effect whereby species-richness often increases at intermediate levels of urbanization, as reported in some studies of birds (reviewed by Marzlu”
- The importance of urban backgardens on plant and invertebrate recruitment: a field microcosm experiment (2010, background): “Cities comprise a significant component of landscapes within North America and have disproportionate and mostly deleterious impacts on climate and native species (Karl et al. 1988; Czech et al. 2000; McKinney 2002, 2006, 2008; Chace and Walsh 2006; Churkina 2008; Stone 2008).”
- The ecology of urban areas and their functions for species diversity (2011, positive): “Various authors report a positive correlation both between native vegetation elements and species richness (Chace and Walsh 2006) and between native vegetation elements and, for example, native bird species or arthropods (McIntyre et al. 2001; Daniels and Kirkpatrick 2006).”
- Invasion, Competition, and Biodiversity Loss in Urban Ecosystems (2010, background): “In the long term, the competition for resources may cause local extinction of potentially adaptable native species (species that can find a suitable habitat in urban settings), leading to reduced biodiversity, a pattern recognized worldwide (Marzluff 2001, Chace and Walsh 2006, Grimm et al. 2008).”
- Growing in Cities: An Urban Penalty for Wild Birds? A Study of Phenotypic Differences between Urban and Rural Great Tit Chicks (Parus major) (2017, neutral): “While some species seem unable to cope with this modified environment (urban avoiders) others can still be found in this specific environment (urban-tolerant species, Chace and Walsh, 2006).”
- The breeding performance of raptors in urban landscapes: a review and meta-analysis (2017, background): “2015) and reduced predation and persecution (Tella et al. 1996; Chace and Walsh 2006; Lin et al. 2015), offering them superior-quality habitat”