Remark: Putting Phases in Perspective
By Cedric Boeckx, K. Grohmann. 2007
81 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: History and Philosophy of Science, Language and Linguistics, Philosophy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59d8b5944e7f5393966675fd26de27c1100c6458
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In History and Philosophy of Science
In Language and Linguistics
In Philosophy
Citations in the corpus
- The Origin and Content of Expletives: Evidence from “Selection” (2009, unknown): “25 See Koontz-Garboden (2005, 2007) on the link between change-of-state semantics and verbhood.”
- The Amharic Definite Marker and the Syntax–Morphology Interface (2010, background): “Chomsky (1986:80) suggested that AP is a barrier, which might indicate that it is a phase (see Boeckx and Grohmann 2007 on the similarity between phases and barriers).”
- Ergatives Move Too Early: On an Instance of Opacity in Syntax (2015, unknown): “…intermediate stop in SpecT. is can be ensured in various ways: either by assuming that TP is a phase (Richards 2011), by stipulation (Chomsky 2005, Boeckx and Grohmann 2007), or by assuming that every phrase is a phase (for successive-cyclic movement through all intermediate phrase edges see,…”
- Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis (2014, background): “…have explicitly or implicitly argued that phasehood is actually not picky: every phrase counts as a phase (for relevant discussion, see, e.g., Manzini 1994, Bo'ković 2002, Epstein and Seely 2002, Boeckx 2003, 2007, Fox and Lasnik 2003, Boeckx and Grohmann 2007, Lahne 2008, Müller 2010, 2011).”