Breaking Up Prolonged Sitting Reduces Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Responses

By David W. Dunstan, B. Kingwell, R. Larsen, G. Healy, Ester Cerin, M. Hamilton, J. Shaw, D. Bertovic, P. Zimmet, J. Salmon and 1 more. Diabetes Care, 2012

1,168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

OBJECTIVE Observational studies show breaking up prolonged sitting has beneficial associations with cardiometabolic risk markers, but intervention studies are required to investigate causality. We examined the acute effects on postprandial glucose and insulin levels of uninterrupted sitting compared with sitting interrupted by brief bouts of light- or moderate-intensity walking. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Overweight/obese adults (n = 19), aged 45–65 years, were recruited for a randomized three-period, three-treatment acute crossover trial: 1) uninterrupted sitting; 2) seated with 2-min bouts of light-intensity walking every 20 min; and 3) seated with 2-min bouts of moderate-intensity walking every 20 min. A standardized test drink was provided after an initial 2-h period of uninterrupted sitting. The positive incremental area under curves (iAUC) for glucose and insulin (mean [95% CI]) for the 5 h after the test drink (75 g glucose, 50 g fat) were calculated for the respective treatments. RESULTS The glucose iAUC (mmol/L) ⋅ h after both activity-break conditions was reduced (light: 5.2 [4.1–6.6]; moderate: 4.9 [3.8–6.1]; both P < 0.01) compared with uninterrupted sitting (6.9 [5.5–8.7]). Insulin iAUC (pmol/L) ⋅ h was also reduced with both activity-break conditions (light: 633.6 [552.4–727.1]; moderate: 637.6 [555.5–731.9], P < 0.0001) compared with uninterrupted sitting (828.6 [722.0–950.9]). CONCLUSIONS Interrupting sitting time with short bouts of light- or moderate-intensity walking lowers postprandial glucose and insulin levels in overweight/obese adults. This may improve glucose metabolism and potentially be an important public health and clinical intervention strategy for reducing cardiovascular risk.

Subfields: Complementary and alternative medicine, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59d440ab2be9746417ce00ff099229203b4a3bd2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Complementary and alternative medicine

  1. Søren Brage

In Physiology

  1. Eran Segal
  2. Stuart J. H. Biddle
  3. Deborah F. Tate
  4. T. Gorely
  5. Søren Brage
  6. Eran Elinav
  7. David W. Dunstan

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. Eran Segal
  2. Stuart J. H. Biddle
  3. T. Gorely
  4. Søren Brage
  5. David W. Dunstan

Citations in the corpus