A reputation-based approach for choosing reliable resources in peer-to-peer networks

By Ernesto Damiani, Sabrina De Capitani di Vimercati, Stefano Paraboschi, Pierangela Samarati, F. Violante. Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 2002

737 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/59cd4fed806638a48796127206110022d005c432

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A reputation system for peer-to-peer networks (2003, background): “Reliable peer reputations could be used in a variety of ways.”
Survey of research towards robust peer-to-peer networks: Search methods (2006, background): “Security Character [172-182] Identity Reputation and Trust Incentives Goals [25, 27, 71, 183-197] Availability Authenticity Anonymity Access Control Fair Trading”
A reputation-based trust management system for P2P networks (2004, background): “An important idea of [3] is to maintain reputations for resources as well as for peers.”
Security and Privacy Issues of Fog Computing: A Survey (2015, neutral): “[7] proposed a robust reputation system for resource selection in P2P networks using a distributed polling algorithm to assess the reliability of a resource before downloading.”
Trust Computations and Trust Dynamics in Mobile Adhoc Networks: A Survey (2012, methodology): “A reputation scheme using distributed polling for P2P networks is proposed in [82].”
A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision (2007, background): “Many authors have proposed reputation systems for P2P netwo rks [2,12,13,17,23,35,39].”
Uncheatable Reputation for Distributed Computation Markets (2006, background): “[6] extend Gnutella to include reputations not only for participants but also for individual resources.”
Secure Remote Execution of Sequential Computations (2009, background): “With the exception of reputation/voting-based solutions [15], [16], [17], [18], an even smaller subset of these works proposes practical and efficient solutions to securely verify the execution of generic classes of sequential computations [4].”
SybilLimit: A Near-Optimal Social Network Defense Against Sybil Attacks (2010, background): “A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2008.”
A survey of attack and defense techniques for reputation systems (2009, background): “Some systems, such as Scrivener [Nandi et al. 2005] and XRep [Damiani et al. 2002], utilize discrete metrics which have various prede.ned levels of reputability and allow for a more .exible application of the reputation information since different actions can correspond to different levels of…”
TrustGuard: countering vulnerabilities in reputation management for decentralized overlay networks (2005, background): “TrustGuard: Countering Vulnerabilities in Reputation Management for Decentralized Overlay Networks Mudhakar Srivatsa, Li Xiong, Ling Liu College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology {mudhakar, lxiong, lingliu}@cc.gatech.edu ABSTRACT Reputation systems have been popular in estimating the tr”
A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web (2007, neutral): “…Trust in P2P networks and grids (Kamvar et al., 2003) [47] (Cornelli et al., 2002) [48] (Aberer and Despotovic, 2001) [49] (Damiani et al., 2002) [50] (Olmedilla et al., 2005) [7] Application-specific reputation (Pirzada and McDonald, 2004) [61] (Dash et al., 2004) [62] (Josang and Ismail,…”