How (not) to pay for advice: A framework for consumer financial protection ☆
By Roman Inderst, Marco Ottaviani. 2012
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5970da09e0dcee8e36f8894b35645f4a180ab24f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jon Reuter
- Jonathan Zinman
- B. Kőszegi
- Diane Del Guercio
- Michaela Pagel
- Abhijit Banerjee
- Jay R. Ritter
- K. Ericson
Citations in the corpus
- Mutual Fund Performance and the Incentive to Generate Alpha (2012, background): “…(2012), Chalmers and Reuter (2012), Mullainathan, Nöth, and Schoar (2012), and Anagol, Cole, and Sarkar (2012) for empirical evidence, and Gennaioli, Shleifer, and Vishny (2012) and Inderst and Ottaviani (2012) for theoretical models of the impact of brokers and bundled advice on investor welfare.”
- Household Debt: Facts, Puzzles, Theories, and Policies (2015, background): “See, e.g., Malkiel (2013) and Inderst and Ottaviani (2012).”
- Behavioral Contract Theory (2014, background): “Similarly, Inderst and Ottaviani (2012) and Murooka (2013) show that because the distorted advice financial advisors provide is driven by the large commissions firms pay, capping or banning commissions, or requiring commissions to be uniform across products, can raise consumer welfare.30 30…”