Constructs, measurements and models of acculturation and acculturative stress

553 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measures Matter (2014, methodology): “However, this approach seems to be flawed conceptually (Boski, 2008; Playford & Safdar, 2007; Rudmin, 2009) and statistically (DeCoster, Iselin, & Gallucci, 2009; Fitzsimons, 2008; MacCallum et al., 2002).”
Assessment of acculturation : Issues and overview of measures (2011, unknown): “…areas: scale descriptors, psychometric properties, and conceptual and theoretical structure; extensive, non-evaluative overviews can be found in Rudmin (2009, 2011) (see http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol8/iss1/9) and Taras…”
Transnational Families and Social Technologies: Reassessing Immigration Psychology (2012, unknown): “Even if we accepted acculturation as a pattern that immigrants go through, the concept has little descriptive power (Chirkov 2009; Rudmin 2009).”
Biculturalism and Adjustment (2013, background): “…[e.g., Unger, Gallaher, Shakib, Ritt-Olson, Palmer, & Johnson’s (2002) Acculturation, Habits, and Interests Multicultural Scale of Adolescents; see Rudmin, 2009; for a review] and the fact that these scales [e.g., Berry, Kim, Power, Young, & Bujaki’s (1989) Acculturation Attitudes scale] tend to…”