Positive Psychology: A Foucauldian Critique

By M. McDonald, Jean O'callaghan. 2008

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This article analyzes and critiques some of the “truth claims” of positive psychology by applying Foucault's concepts of power/knowledge, discipline, and governmentality. It illustrates how positive psychology deploys mechanisms to devalue, subjugate, and discredit humanistic psychology. It also illustrates how positive psychology privileges particular modes of functioning by classifying and categorizing character strengths and virtues, supporting a neo-liberal economic and political discourse. Last, it offers an alternative position to the prescriptive and constraining ideology of positive psychology. Such a position enables a meta-perspective and reflexivity that could sustain a flexible approach to understanding key issues like human happiness and well-being, as well as open the way for a more productive, rather than adversarial, dialogue, with humanistic psychology.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58fbdb50da1dd37c62dcf7ff3d3bc36c8a23f758

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. J. Denison
2. C. Cushion

Citations in the corpus

• Sports’ disciplinary legacy and the challenge of ‘coaching differently’ (2017, background): “…a similar argument to the one we are making here concerning the challenge of empowering individuals within an overarching disciplinary framework, McDonald and O’Callaghan (2008) critiqued the ‘truth claims’ or promises of the positive psychology movement ‘to redress the balance in psychology…”