Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis
By G. Johansson. 1973
Subfields: Neuroscience, Cognitive Science & Psychology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Neuroscience
- Lior Wolf
- Thomas Serre
- Andrew Zisserman
- Ian M. Thornton
- Hueihan Jhuang
- Shimon Ullman
- Alan L. Yuille
- Randolph Blake
In Cognitive Science & Psychology
- Juan Carlos Niebles
- Chen Sun
- Jason J. Corso
- Kevin P. Murphy
- Rebekah E. Gunns
- Liang Wang
- Caifeng Shan
- J. Feldman
Citations in the corpus
- Co-Occurrence Feature Learning for Skeleton Based Action Recognition Using Regularized Deep LSTM Networks (2016, background): “Biological observations suggest that humans can recognize actions from just the motion of a few light displays attached to the human body (Johansson 1973).”
- Space-Time Representation of People Based on 3D Skeletal Data: A Review (2016, background): “The concept of skeleton-based representation can be traced back to the early seminal research of Johansson [35], which”
- Skeleton-Based Online Action Prediction Using Scale Selection Network (2019, background): “The biological studies [5] demonstrate that skeleton data”
- When Kernel Methods Meet Feature Learning: Log-Covariance Network for Action Recognition From Skeletal Data (2017, background): “It has in fact been proved by Johansson [17] that the displacement of light sources located on keypoints on the humans’ skeleton are enough for the visual system to recognizing the displayed action (such as walking, Fig.”
- Modeling Temporal Dynamics and Spatial Configurations of Actions Using Two-Stream Recurrent Neural Networks (2017, background): “Humans can recognize actions with a few spots describing motions of the main joints of skeletons [24], and experiments show that a large set of actions can be recognized solely from skeletons [25].”
- Interpretable 3D Human Action Analysis with Temporal Convolutional Networks (2017, background): “Even without the context information and visual cues, early work [17] in biological perception and more recent methods [9, 10, 31] provide strong evidence that encoding humans as a 3D skeleton yields both a discriminative and a robust representation for activity analysis.”
- An End-to-End Spatio-Temporal Attention Model for Human Action Recognition from Skeleton Data (2016, background): “Fortunately, biological observations from the early seminal work of Johansson suggest that the positions of a small number of joints can effectively represent human behavior even without appearance information (Johansson 1973).”
- A Hierarchical Pose-Based Approach to Complex Action Understanding Using Dictionaries of Actionlets and Motion Poselets (2016, background): “In effect, as noticed long ago, body poses are highly informative to discriminate among human actions [13].”
- Tensor Representations via Kernel Linearization for Action Recognition from 3D Skeletons (2016, background): “A temporal evolution of the human skeleton is very informative for action recognition as shown by Johansson in his seminal experiment involving the moving lights display [13].”
- A Biologically Inspired System for Action Recognition (2007, methodology): “been tested on simple artificial stimuli such as point-light motion stimuli [ 27 ].”
- An Attention Enhanced Graph Convolutional LSTM Network for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition (2019, background): “[9] have given an empirical and theoretical basis that key joints can provide highly effective information about human motion.”
- Biological movements look uniform: evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. (1992, background): “For instance, it is known that gait (Beardworth & Bukner, 1981; Cutting, 1981; Cutting & Proffitt, 1981; Johansson, 1973) and other biomechanical patterns such as dancing (Johansson, 1973) can be recognized reliably even when they are described visually in the most succinct way.”
- Attention Routines and the Architecture of Selection (2004, background): “The recognition of characteristic motions is so robust that a human form is rapidly recognized from the motions of a set of lights attached to a person filmed while walking, running, or performing push-ups in the dark (Johansson, 1973; Neri, Morrone, & Burr, 1998).”
- Emotion Perception from Dynamic and Static Body Expressions in Point-Light and Full-Light Displays (2004, methodology): “4 Implications for the PL technique It is generally regarded that the PL technique for the study of biological motion eliminates or at least substantially reduces static form information (Johansson 1973).”
- A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. (2003, background): “The use of our own motor system in understanding actions could underlie our extraordinary ability to detect and identify biological motion ( Johansson 1973).”
- RPAN: An End-to-End Recurrent Pose-Attention Network for Action Recognition in Videos (2017, background): “Alternatively, human poses have proven useful for action recognition [14, 15, 17, 25, 40].”