A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction.
By D. M. Wolpert, Kenji Doya, Mitsuo Kawato. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2003
1,244 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08ae739bdaf076355b3c6f3b55ac46214ff7fa58
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- ChrisD . Frith
- Karl J. Friston
- Giacomo Rizzolatti
- Martin Brüne
- Vittorio Gallese †
- Elliot C. Brown
- Gregory Hickok
- Giovanni Pezzulo
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- ChrisD . Frith
- Vittorio Gallese †
- Gregory Hickok
- Marco Iacoboni
- Rolf A. Zwaan
- Gereon R. Fink
- Giacomo Rizzolatti
- Martin H. Fischer
In Social Psychology
- Giacomo Rizzolatti
- Marco Iacoboni
- ChrisD . Frith
- Vittorio Gallese †
- Karl J. Friston
- Martin Brüne
- Gregory Hickok
- Christian Keysers
Citations in the corpus
- Computational neuroanatomy of speech production (2012, background): “For these reasons, the SFC approach has been highly influential and is widely accepted within the visuomotor domain 8,13,14 .”
- Analogues of mental simulation and imagination in deep learning (2019, positive): “For example, simulations from forward models in the motor systems must occur in less than 100ms to support real-time action [7].”
- The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions (2011, methodology): “The models can be recruited to infer the meaning of a perceived action given the sensory information (Wolpert et al., 2003).”
- Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. (2003, positive): “The second matching paradigm is based on the idea of predictive forward models (Miall & Wolpert 1996; Schaal 1997; Atkeson & Schaal 1997a; Wolpert et al. 1998, 2003; Demiris & Hayes 2002).”
- Neural and Computational Mechanisms of Action Processing: Interaction between Visual and Motor Representations. (2015, background): “It postulates that different parts of the mirror neuron system correspond to the components of a Bayesian action classifier and accomplishes classifications of hand actions from video input, using a computer-vision input model that is not biologically plausible.”
- The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data (2008, background): “…and Matelli 2003; Rizzolatti and Craighero 2004; Selemon and Goldman-Rakic 1988; Schmahmann and Pandya 1989; Stein and Glickstein 1992; Thach et al. 1992; Wolpert et al. 1998; Wolpert Cerebral Cortex June 2009, V 19 N 6 1249 and Ghahramani 2000; Tanne-Gariepy et al. 2002; Wolpert et al. 2003).”
- Pitch discrimination in cerebellar patients: evidence for a sensory deficit. (2009, positive): “…and perception (Ackermann et al., 2007; Ackermann, 2008), context and response mapping (Thach, 1997; Bloedel and Bracha, 1997), state estimation (Paulin, 2005; Miall et al., 2007), and adaptive forward/inverse models (Kawato et al., 1987; Wolpert et al., 1998, 2003; Ito, 2008), among others.”
- Consensus Paper: The Cerebellum's Role in Movement and Cognition (2013, background): “The reuse of existing internal models, together with the acquisition of novel models (not necessarily linked to bodily movements), enables many cognitive abilities, such as predicting and understanding external events [203], planning action sequences, understanding affordances, using tools [204], re”
- Two Takes on the Social Brain: A Comparison of Theory of Mind Tasks (2007, result): “This level of abstraction is consistent with the highest level of action representation in the hierarchical mosaic model of Wolpert, Doya, and Kawato (2003) .”
- Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system (2007, methodology): “It is now generally accepted that forward or generative models play a critical role in motor control (Wolpert et al. 1995, 2003; Wolpert and Miall 1996).”
- Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing (2009, background): “Within these models, 'forward models' (predictors) can be used to predict the consequences of actions, whereas 'inverse models' (controllers) determine the motor commands required to produce a desired outcom”
- Mirror Neuron and Theory of Mind Mechanisms Involved in Face-to-Face Interactions: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Approach to Empathy (2007, background): “A facial expression of emotion can be referred to as a goal-directed social action used to intentionally affect the mental state of others (Wolpert et al., 2003).”
- Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. (2006, neutral): “Although this is theoretically possible [ 54 ] it will ultimately involve inferring the utility functions of others which is a computationally hard problem [55].”
- The ADaptation and Anticipation Model (ADAM) of sensorimotor synchronization (2013, methodology): “Internal models can be employed to make predictions about others’ actions, including the timing of these actions (e.g., Knoblich and Jordan, 2003; Wolpert et al., 2003; Blakemore and Frith, 2005; Wilson and Knoblich, 2005; Keller, 2008).”