Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation
By Ching-Hsue Cheng, Yin-Fang Lin. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002
621 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Ocean Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/588b855beb4256c8ae820b84b6c254a16c1a82af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Enrique Herrera-Viedma
- Francisco Herrera
- Luis Martínez-López
- Zeshui Xu
- Francisco Chiclana
- Tien-Chin Wang
- F. Cabrerizo
- Yucheng Dong
In Ocean Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method (2007, background): “This is because that GDM is the process of arriving at a consensus based upon the reaction of multiple individuals, whereby an acceptable judgment may be obtained (Cheng & Lin, 2002).”
- Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment (2007, background): “Cheng and Lin (2002) applied fuzzy decision theory to evaluate main battle tanks.”
- A Fuzzy Linguistic Methodology to Deal With Unbalanced Linguistic Term Sets (2008, background): “The fuzzy linguistic approach [54]–[56] deals with qualitative aspects that are represented in qualitative terms by means of linguistic variables, providing an important tool for solving problems in different areas such as information retrieval [7], [8], [26]–[28], [35], [36], [57], services evaluat”
- An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: Extensions, applications and challenges (2012, background): “Despite most of problems modelling information with linguistic assessments use linguistic variables assessed in linguistic term sets whose terms are uniform and symmetrically distributed [22,38,77,107].”