Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Cultivar Yields Compared with Sister Lines

By R. Elmore, F. Roeth, L. Nelson, C. Shapiro, R. Klein, Stevan Knezevic, Alex R. Martin. 2001

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/585da5d044236b739bb052f23e9ed1598bad4c74

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. R. M. Zablotowicz
2. L. Heatherly
3. R. Elmore
4. R. Viator
5. Krishna N. Reddy
6. K. Mcafee
7. A. Price
8. G. Moschini

Citations in the corpus

• Reproductive abnormalities in glyphosate-resistant cotton caused by lower CP4-EPSPS levels in the male reproductive tissue (2002, background): “, but this was attributed to differences between the GR and conventional isolines and not to the glyphosate applications (Elmore et al. 2001).”
• The Realized Yield Effect of Genetically Engineered Crops: U.S. Maize and Soybean (2013, background): “These findings confirm the yield drag concerns about GE soybean varieties raised previously (Elmore et al., 2001; National Research Council, 2010).”
• Nitrogenase activity, nitrogen content, and yield responses to glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (2007, background): “However, recently a few studies reported reduced soybean yield under stress conditions such as low water availability and in certain glyphosateresistant soybean cultivars ( Elmore et al., 2001b; King et al., 2001).”
• Evolution of Glyphosate-Resistant Crop Technology (2009, background): “University research indicated that GR soybean yielded 5 to 7% less than conventional varieties, but it was never determined whether this ‘‘yield drag’’ was due to the trait, to the genes associated with the insertion point, or to the first commercial varieties retaining too much of the lower-yieldin”
• Neoliberalism on the molecular scale. Economic and genetic reductionism in biotechnology battles (2003, background): “Yields of genetically modified soy beans have not matched those of non-genetically altered types (Carpenter, 2001; Benbrook, 1999, 2001; Elmore et al., 2001).”
• Conventional and glyphosate-resistant maize yields across plant densities in single- and twin-row configurations (2011, background): “Elmore et al. (2001) reported a 10% ield decrease for herbicide resistant cultivars compared to their on-herbicide resistant sister cultivar in soybean [Glycine max (L.) err.].”
• Managing Inputs for Peak Production (2016, result): “26 In contrast to the unpublished Monsanto report (X. Delannay, personal communication, 1999), GR sister lines yielded 27 5% (200 kg ha ; 3 bu acre ) less than the non-GR sister lines (Table 10-5) (Elmore et al., 2001b).”