Where is the Support in Perceived Support? The Role of Generic Relationship Satisfaction and Enacted Support in Perceived Support's Relation to Low Distress

By M. Kaul, B. Lakey. 2003

165 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5855fbf3409d45dddda70d96e449baf5e3e070ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Perceived social support, coping, and symptoms of distress in American and Spanish students (2006, background): “The experience of difficulties such as rejection by others or arguments with friends or family could negatively affect the quality of social relationships and, consequently, the perceived availability of others to provide help and support (Kaul & Lakey, 2003 ).”
Social support as a mediator of the relationship between perfectionism and depression: A preliminary test of the social disconnection model (2008, result): “This pattern of findings has been found in previous studies (e.g., Kaul & Lakey, 2003) and suggests that received and perceived social support may be differentially related to depressive symptoms, with a felt sense of detachment from other people potentially being more relevant to depressive…”
Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory (2010, methodology): “This study also echoes several studies on social support (Kaul & Lakey, 2003; Lakey & Lutz, 1996; Reinhardt, Boerner, & Horowitz, 2006) that revealed ‘‘perceived support” to be positively associated with well-being variables whereas ‘‘received support” had no or negative effects.”
Explaining Variations in the Effects of Supportive Messages A Dual-Process Framework (2008, background): “…high levels of perceived support availability evaluate standard support messages more favorably than do people with low levels of perceived support (Kaul & Lakey, 2003; Lakey, McCabe, Fiscaro, & Drew, 1996; Lakey, Moineau, & Drew, 1992; Mankowski & Wyer, 1996; Pierce, B. R. Sarason, & I. G.…”
Relational regulation theory: a new approach to explain the link between perceived social support and mental health. (2011, result): “Consistent with these predictions, among mothers awaiting their infants’ heart surgeries, generic relationship quality, but not en-acted support accounted for perceived support’s link to low distress (Kaul & Lakey, 2003).”
Perceived social support, received social support, and depression among clergy (2019, background): “In some cases, higher levels of received support is associated with worse mental health outcomes (Gleason, Iida, Shrout, & Bolger, 2008; Kaul & Lakey, 2003; Liang et al., 2001; Maisel & Gable, 2009; Myroniuk & Anglewicz, 2015; Reinhardt, Boerner, & Horowitz, 2006).”
The Effects of Social Support, Depression, and Stress on Drinking Behaviors in a College Student Sample (2009, background): “…individuals’ scores on the all-cause measure of perceived availability of social support had a strong, negative relationship that has demonstrated that the mere perception of support availability is more important to individuals’ well-being than the actual receipt of support (Kaul & Lakey, 2003).”
Good to have but not to use: Differential impact of perceived and received support on well-being (2006, background): “Yet, an interesting dichotomy exists in the social support literature showing that perceived support has a positive association with wellbeing variables, yet, received social support is either unrelated or negatively related to these outcomes (Kaul & Lakey, 2003; Lakey & Lutz, 1996).”
Influence of Social Identity on Self-Efficacy Beliefs Through Perceived Social Support: A Social Identity Theory Perspective (2016, background): “Received support is typically objectively assessed (Barrera, 1986) while perceived support is subjectively reported (Kaul & Lakey, 2003).”
The relationship between self-reported received and perceived social support: A meta-analytic review (2007, unknown): “…No Student SPS-Gd No Part Emmons and Colby (1995) 105 .46 Yes High Yes Student ISEL No Full Furchner (1998) 111 .64 Yes Low No Student SSQSR-Se Yes Full Kaul and Lakey (2003) 60 .32 Yes Low Yes No (Community) SPS No Part Lakey and Cassady (1990) 101 .29 No High Yes Student ISEL No Full Lakey et…”