Dopamine and adaptive memory.
By Daphna Shohamy, R. Alison Adcock. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2010
691 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/58523bf024dbf14755e37444533bd7be4ff7031a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Nicolas Frémaux
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Charan Ranganath
- Daphna Shohamy
- G. E. Wimmer
- Nathaniel D. Daw
- Matthias J. Gruber
- Maureen Ritchey
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Nicolas Frémaux
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Charan Ranganath
- Mark D'Esposito
- Daphna Shohamy
- G. E. Wimmer
- Bradley R. Postle
- Nathaniel D. Daw
In Neurology
- Matthias J. Gruber
- Charan Ranganath
- Bernard D. Gelman
- Mark L. Howe
- Mark D'Esposito
- Daphna Shohamy
- Wulfram Gerstner
- Nathaniel D. Daw
Citations in the corpus
- THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF WORKING MEMORY (2007, background): “Silvanto and Cattaneo (2010) demonstrated that this percept is systematically influenced when TMS is delivered while the subject is engaged in STM for the direction of motion of a target stimulus.”
- States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit (2014, positive): “…to memory formation during curious states strongly parallel theoretical accounts and findings in rodents showing that dopaminergic activity can modulate hippocampus-dependent learning (for reviews, see D üzel et al., 2010; Lisman and Grace, 2005; Lisman et al., 2011; Shohamy and Adcock, 2010).”
- The Adaptive Nature of Memory and Its Illusions (2011, background): “That is, “when individuals encounter new information that evokes old associations, this associative novelty can promote not only preferential encoding but also the organization of memory to facilitate its later use—processes that could be catalyzed by dopamine” (Shohamy & Adcock, 2010, p. 468).”
- Neuromodulated Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity, and Theory of Three-Factor Learning Rules (2016, background): “While the broader field of neuromodulation, plasticity, and behavioral learning has been reviewed before (Martin et al., 2000; Gu, 2002; Reynolds and Wickens, 2002; Schultz, 2002, 2006; Hasselmo, 2006; Shohamy and Adcock, 2010; Lisman et al., 2011; Nadim and Bucher, 2014), this review mainly focuses”
- Post-learning hippocampal dynamics promote preferential retention of rewarding events (2016, methodology): “Several theories suggest that dopaminergic input from the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area complex (SN/VTA) to the hippocampus is enhanced during learning of motivationally significant events (Düzel et al., 2009; Kahn and Shohamy, 2013; Lisman and Grace, 2005; Lisman et al., 2011; Shohamy and”
- Selectivity in Postencoding Connectivity with High-Level Visual Cortex Is Associated with Reward-Motivated Memory (2017, background): “These memory enhancements emerged even though delayed memory tests were not explicitly incentivized, suggesting that reward may facilitate long-term memory for information that may be relevant to future adaptive behavior (Shohamy and Adcock, 2010; Lisman et al., 2011).”
- Generalization of value in reinforcement learning by humans (2012, background): “These latter connections have broader implications for how hippocampal memories are influenced by reward, motivation and predictions (e.g. Adcock et al., 2006; Shohamy & Wagner, 2008; Kuhl et al., 2010; for a review see Shohamy & Adcock, 2010).”