Research in social entrepreneurship: past contributions and future opportunities

By Jeremy C. Short, Todd W. Moss, G. Lumpkin. 2009

1,267 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5812724690451092297cad73684fa02e3db970d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Citations in the corpus

What Do We Know about Social Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Empirical Research (2010, background): “Social entrepreneurship is a young field of study (Dees & Battle Anderson, 2006; Dorado, 2006; Short et al., 2009), and our review confirms its current stage of infancy.”
Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities (2012, background): “For example, the area of social entrepreneurship (Short et al., 2009) seems like an excellent context in which to examine how an individual's passion for a specific human need may lead to greater alertness.”
Social entrepreneurship theory and sustainable social impact (2013, background): “As the focus of the different typologies of social enterprises is to produce measurable social impact, researching these types of social organizations will advance research in social sciences (Short et al., 2009; Yunus, 2006; Perrini and Vurro, 2006; Drucker, 1990).”
The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation (2015, positive): “…recognize sampling decisions as crucial in SE research in which accessing large-scale databases is particularly challenging and “creative solutions are needed to provide the adequate sample sizes necessary to utilize rigorous application of multivariate techniques” (Short et al., 2009, p. 176).”
Social Intermediation in Base‐of‐the‐Pyramid Markets (2013, neutral): “Recent reviews of the field have suggested that the outcomes of social entrepreneurship can be explained by existing theories (Dacin et al., 2010; Short et al., 2009).”
Innovation and profit motivations for social entrepreneurship: A fuzzy-set analysis (2019, background): “These authors call for more theory-based research on innovativeness among social entrepreneurs, and others have noted the great diversity of social entrepreneurship and called for greater theory development for social entrepreneurship, and/or the integration of social entrepreneurship into a broader”
Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China (2017, neutral): “So far, research on social entrepreneurship has mostly employed single case studies (Choi and Majumdar 2014; Dey and Steyaert 2010; Mair and Martı́ 2006; Short et al. 2009) with a few exceptions (see Desa 2012; Kistruck et al.”
The social value of productive entrepreneurship (2011, neutral): “Evidence suggests that social entrepreneurship, despite substantial growth as a field of research, still lacks a unified and clear definition (Peredo and McLean 2006; Short et al. 2009; Dacin et al. 2010).”
The Prevalence and Determinants of Social Entrepreneurship at the Macro Level (2016, background): “Empirical studies of social entrepreneurship are dominated by case study designs with micro-level perspectives (Hoogendoorn, Pennings, and Thurik 2010; Short, Moss, and Lumpkin 2009).”