The Cost of Labor Adjustment: Inferences from the Gap

By Russell Cooper, Jonathan L. Willis. 2003

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57cd6ffd1dfa43ecd2dc69ea75c128154767ece4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John C. Haltiwanger
2. Samuel Schenker
3. M. Blatter
4. Samuel Muehlemann
5. Russell Cooper
6. Jonathan L. Willis
7. Lutz Kilian
8. Ruediger Bachmann

In Marketing

1. Samuel Schenker
2. M. Blatter
3. Samuel Muehlemann
4. John C. Haltiwanger
5. Russell Cooper

Citations in the corpus

• Search frictions: Matching aggregate and establishment observations (2007, background): “98 at a monthly frequency, and the Cooper and Willis (2002) estimate of a quarterly profitability shock for the manufacturing sector, which becomes 0.”
• The Costs of Hiring Skilled Workers (2012, methodology): “Cooper and Willis (2009a) use a dynamic model that allows for both convex and non-convex adjustment costs.”
• Labor and the Market Value of the Firm (2007, unknown): “Recent work by Cooper and Haltiwanger (2000) and Cooper and Willis (2003) gives empirical 10 support to the use of a convex adjustment costs function.”
• Dynamics of Labor Demand: Evidence from Plant-Level Observations and Aggregate Implications (2003, unknown): “Cooper and Willis (2002) provides a detailed discussion of the properties of policy functions for the quadratic and fixed adjustment cost specifications.”