Mothering versus Fathering versus Parenting: Measurement Equivalence in Parenting Measures

By K. Adamsons, C. Buehler. 2007

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57b1253295846b8bbea60042a2a5efb43193de50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Natasha J. Cabrera
2. M. Lamb
3. J. Fagan
4. Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

In Demography

1. J. Fagan
2. Natasha J. Cabrera
3. Randal D. Day
4. M. Lamb
5. Catherine S. Tamis-LeMonda

In Social Psychology

1. M. Lamb
2. Natasha J. Cabrera
3. J. Fagan

Citations in the corpus

• Should Researchers Conceptualize Differently the Dimensions of Parenting for Fathers and Mothers? (2014, background): “Adamsons and Buehler concluded that the evidence suggests that measures of harshness and intrusiveness used in their study were equivalent across mothers and fathers. However, this did not seem to be the case regarding acceptance. The authors further concluded that there is a need for future studies”
• Fathering in Australia Among Couple Families with Young Children (2011, unknown): “Likewise, Adamsons and Buehler (2007) found significant mean differences across mothers and fathers on acceptance, but not psychological intrusiveness or harshness.”