Quality of life in the third age: key predictors of the CASP-19 measure

235 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Participation in learning and wellbeing among older adults (2011, methodology): “For further discussion of these measures and their use in social research see Wiggins et al. (2004), Hu et al. 2007, Pavot and Diener (2008), Demakakos et al. (2010).”
Late-career entrepreneurship, income and quality of life (2017, methodology): “An established wellbeing measure in this literature is quality of life (QoL) (Hyde et al., 2003; for applications see e.g., Knesebeck et al., 2007; Wahrendorf and Siegrist, 2010; Webb et al., 2011; Wiggins et al., 2004), which is not only consistent with the needs-satisfaction approach in SDT, but a”
The Impact of Age, Place, Aging in Place, and Attachment to Place on the Well-Being of the Over 50s in England (2007, methodology): “The scale has good psychometric properties (Hyde et al. 2003) and shows consistent associations with health, financial circumstances, and social networks that are consistent with its use as an index of “third age” style well-being (Wiggins et al. 2004).”
Socio-economic position and quality of life among older people in 10 European countries: results of the SHARE study (2007, background): “Although quality of life has become a prominent topic in gerontology, only a few studies have investigated the association between socioeconomic position and quality of life among older people (Marmot et al. 2003; Blane et al. 2004; Walker 2004; Wiggins et al. 2004; Breeze et al. 2005).”