On Some Recent Definitions and Analysis Frameworks for Risk, Vulnerability, and Resilience

By Terje Aven. Risk Analysis, 2011

358 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Civil and Structural Engineering, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5773baf240e1239db54faf4af1b314721f93e217

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Civil and Structural Engineering

In Statistics and Probability

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

A metric and frameworks for resilience analysis of engineered and infrastructure systems (2014, background): “Among these, we will discuss: (i) the idea of resilience as an epistemological 516 property of the system [7], [38]; and, design for ecological versus engineered resilience in socio517 technical systems [39].”
Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey (2013, background): “Manyena (2006) listed 12 definitions of resilience and 20 of vulnerability (the number of definitions of the latter present in the disaster risk reduction literature has swollen to at least twice that – Haimes, 2011).”
The future of risk assessment (2018, background): “Note that the formulation in (3) does not restrict the representation of the uncertainty to the classical probabilistic one and alternative representations can be employed [18,22,57,70,150].”
Consensus on conceptualizations and definitions of trust: Are we there yet? (2015, background): “3 Risk— or “the probability and severity of adverse effects” (Aven, 2011 , p. 511)—includes both a potential negative outcome and some amount of uncertainty inherent in the imperfect probability of its occurrence.”
CEO Narcissism, Risk-Taking, and Resilience: An Empirical Analysis in U.S. Commercial Banks (2019, background): “Riskiness in strategies and policies (instigated by CEO narcissism in combination with poor CG practices) increases organizations’ vulnerability to external conditions (Aven, 2011) and is therefore especially relevant when assessing the impact of extreme events—such as”