Are Judicial Status Hearings A Key Component Of Drug Court? During-Treatment Data From a Randomized Trial

By D. Marlowe, D. Festinger, Patricia A. Lee, Maria M. Schepise, Julie E. R. Hazzard, J. Merrill, ROBERT W. Johnson, F. Mulvaney. 2003

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Randomized experiments in criminology: What have we learned in the last two decades? (2005, background): “Marlowe et al. (2003) evaluated the impact of frequent judicial status hearings for drug court clients compared with hearings as needed.”
Assessing Released Inmates for Substance-Abuse-Related Service Needs (2006, background): “Higher risk clients need a greater intensity of services, and moderate- or low-risk clients need less intensive or comprehensive services (Festinger et al., 2002; Marlowe et al., 2003).”
A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism (2007, methodology): “effective in treating a wide range of criminal offenders ( MacKenzie 2002 ).”
Looking Inside the Black Box of Drug Courts: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2011, background): “Recent studies have focused on drug court effectiveness across offender types (Bouffard li Richardson, 2007; Dannerbeck, Harris, Sundet, li Lloyd, 2006; Gray li Saum, 2005; Hartman, Listwan, & Shaffer, 2007; Listwan, Shaffer, li Hartman, 2009; Shaffer, Hartman, & Listwan, 2009; Shaffer, Listwan, Lat”
Randomized Control Trials in the United States Legal Profession (2016, background): “…(1994a); Kakalik et al. (1996); Kobbervig (1991); Labriola et al. (2005); Labriola et al. (2008); Mandell and Marshall (2002); Margolin (1970); Marlowe et al. (2003); McEwen, Craig A. (1992); McGarrell et al. (2000); Patridge and Lind (1983); Pearson and Thoennes (1984); Rosenberg (1964);…”