Critical Discursive Psychology

By I. Parker. 2002

251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/573068af1bc6073a0fbbd3af969a85efca9c4b32

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. D. Hook
2. Mirjam T. Knapik
3. M. Richardson
4. I. Parker

In Language and Linguistics

1. D. Hook
2. Mirjam T. Knapik
3. M. Richardson
4. I. Parker
5. D. Harper
6. Robert Jones
7. Jaci C. Huws

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. D. Hook
2. Mirjam T. Knapik
3. M. Richardson
4. I. Parker

Citations in the corpus

• The Qualitative Research Interview: Participants' Responsive Participation in Knowledge Making (2006, background): “Further complications include the compelling web of practices and values that constitute psychology as a discipline (Parker, 2003).”
• Qualitative Psychology: Introducing Radical Research (2004, background): “The broader conceptual problems of a discursive framework for understanding the reality of exploitation are sometimes greater than the benefits of carrying out this kind of research (Parker 2002); it should never be treated as a substitute for political analysis (Jones 2004).”
• Counseling for Work and RelationshipΨ (2012, background): “Parsons and Bales (1954) theorized that society was constituted by two separate and gendered domains of life.”
• A Critical Psychology of the Postcolonial (2005, background): “Turning to Parker (2002), we may understand critical psychology as the systematic examination of how dominant accounts of psychology operate ideologically, and in the services of power.”