Competencies and Institutions Fostering High-growth Firms

By Magnus Henrekson, Dan Johansson. 2008

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56f1527d9ab9bf42772f5264daf87e29fcd7dfb0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Niklas Elert
2. Selin Dilli
3. Jun Du
4. E. Stam
5. A. Herrmann
6. Yama Temouri
7. E. Malecki
8. J. Love

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Niklas Elert
2. Selin Dilli
3. Jun Du
4. E. Stam
5. A. Herrmann
6. E. Malecki
7. Andrew H. Van de Ven
8. Ron A. Boschma

Citations in the corpus

• Varieties of entrepreneurship: exploring the institutional foundations of different entrepreneurship types through ‘Varieties-of-Capitalism’ arguments (2018, background): “Formal institutions that have been identified as particularly important for entrepreneurship include the protection of private property, tax codes, social insurance systems, employment protection legislation, competition policy, trade policies, capital market regulation, contract enforcement, as wel”
• Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence (2010, unknown): “policies likely to foster Gazelles, see Henrekson and Johansson (2009) .”
• Entrepreneurial and Business Growth and the Quest for a “Comprehensive Theory”: Tilting at Windmills? (2010, unknown): “However, this is problematic as it has led to the creation of “mythical concepts,” “myths,” “assumptions,” “rituals,” and “confusions” (Gibb; Henrekson & Johansson, 2008).”
• The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach (2017, unknown): “Several authors including Henrekson and Johansson (2008), Boettke and Coyne (2009), and Acs et al. (2014) have suggested different institutional configurations to enable venture creation and growth.”
• High-growth firms and productivity: evidence from the United Kingdom (2015, background): “productivity levels and higher productivity growth (Bhaumik et al, 2011; Teruel and Wit, 2011; Henrekson and Johansson, 2009; Hölzl, 2009).”
• Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique (2015, background): “…in line with recent academic work on regional innovation and growth (cf. Boschma & Martin, 2010; Cooke et al., 2011), while the focus on ambitious entrepreneurship and institutions is also a key feature of recent academic entrepreneurship research (Henrekson & Johansson, 2009; Stam et al., 2012).”