Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials

By Arturo Keller, Suzanne McFerran, Anastasiya Lazareva, Sangwon Suh. Journal of nanoparticle research, 2013

1,280 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Pollution

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56e263e7d0efb018c395e07fe8bf46a363a9cb31

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. A. Nel
2. Arturo Keller
3. J. Zink
4. Anastasiya Lazareva

In Materials Chemistry

1. Arturo Keller
2. Hongtao Wang
3. William Vosti
4. Kendra L Garner
5. Anastasiya Lazareva
6. A. Nel
7. G. Metreveli
8. Stephan Wagner

In Pollution

1. S. Hayat
2. A. Nel
3. Arturo Keller
4. Anastasiya Lazareva

Citations in the corpus

• Nanoparticles in the environment: where do we come from, where do we go to? (2018, background): “The dominating emission pathway of TiO2 NP occurs via wastewater (85% of total TiO2 NP emissions) [30, 47].”
• Zinc oxide nanoparticle-mediated changes in photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant system of tomato plants (2018, background): “These NPs end up in various habitats including soil (Keller et al. 2013).”
• Chemistry, Biochemistry of Nanoparticles, and Their Role in Antioxidant Defense System in Plants (2015, background): “Among the most produced and used metal-based ENPs are zinc oxide (nZnO), titanium dioxide (nTiO2), gold (nAu), silver (nAg), cerium oxide (nCeO2), and copper (nCu) NPs (Keller et al. 2013).”
• Release of engineered nanomaterials from personal care products throughout their life cycle (2014, background): “(2007) predicted concentrations of various ENMs from PCPs in soil, sludge, and water, while Keller et al. (2013) modeled total global ENM emissions from PCPs as well as emissions per ENM from PCPs. Gottschalk et al. (2010) modeled the fate of nanoTiO2 and Ag emitted from cosmetics into wastewater…”
• Emerging patterns for engineered nanomaterials in the environment: a review of fate and toxicity studies (2014, background): “ENMs are released into the environment; either during their use, by spillages, by intentional release for environmental remediation applications, or as end-of-life waste (Keller et al. 2013).”
• The Toxicity of Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) to Three Freshwater Invertebrates With Different Life Strategies: Hydra vulgaris, Daphnia carinata, and Paratya australiensis (2018, background): “There are however concerns regarding the extensive application of NPs and rapid proliferation of NP-enabled products which may lead to a high release into the environment and cause deleterious effects on the organisms that are constantly exposed to these materials (Navarro et al., 2008a; Keller et a”
• Silver nanoparticles in soil–plant systems (2013, neutral): “5 %) (Keller et al. 2013).”
• Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Induce Minimal Phenotypic Changes in a Model Colon Gut Microbiota (2015, neutral): “…15,600 metric tons year - 1 of TiO 2 nanomaterials, 3,700 metric tons year - 1 of ZnO nanomaterials, and 300 metric tons year - 1 of CeO 2 nanomaterials enter water systems with the majority of these NPs discharged from wastewater treatment plants (Keller and Lazareva, 2013; Keller et al. , 2013).”
• Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials (2017, background): “It is estimated that only a few hundred tons of the total production were converted to Cu-based nanoparticles (Cu NPs) (Keller et al., 2013), despite there being many emerging applications for nano-Cu materials.”