The Impact of Astrocytic Gap Junctional Coupling on Potassium Buffering in the Hippocampus

By A. Wallraff, R. Köhling, U. Heinemann, M. Theis, K. Willecke, C. Steinhäuser. Journal of Neuroscience, 2006

594 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Astrocytic gap junctions have been suggested to contribute to spatial buffering of potassium in the brain. Direct evidence has been difficult to gather because of the lack of astrocyte-specific gap junction blockers. We obtained mice with coupling-deficient astrocytes by crossing conditional connexin43-deficient mice with connexin30−/− mice. Similar to wild-type astrocytes, genetically uncoupled hippocampal astrocytes displayed negative resting membrane potentials, time- and voltage-independent whole-cell currents, and typical astrocyte morphologies. Astrocyte densities were also unchanged. Using potassium-selective microelectrodes, we assessed changes in potassium buffering in hippocampal slices of mice with coupling-deficient astrocytes. We demonstrate that astrocytic gap junctions accelerate potassium clearance, limit potassium accumulation during synchronized neuronal firing, and aid in radial potassium relocation in the stratum lacunosum moleculare. Furthermore, slices of mice with coupling-deficient astrocytes displayed a reduced threshold for the generation of epileptiform events. However, it was evident that radial relocation of potassium in the stratum radiatum was not dependent on gap junctional coupling. We suggest that the perpendicular array of individual astrocytes in the stratum radiatum makes these cells ideally suited for spatial buffering of potassium released by pyramidal cells, independent of gap junctions. In general, a surprisingly large capacity for K+ clearance was conserved in mice with coupling-deficient astrocytes, indicating that gap junction-dependent processes only partially account for K+ buffering in the hippocampus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/56d8f850f3b6b1b4990be656763abda5f016e3a2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. M. Pekny
  2. M. Sofroniew
  3. M. Pekna
  4. E. Hol
  5. Ole Petter Ottersen
  6. David Holcman
  7. Alexei Verkhratsky
  8. J. Burda

In Molecular Biology

  1. M. Sofroniew
  2. M. Pekna
  3. M. Pekny
  4. Erlend A. Nagelhus
  5. Ole Petter Ottersen
  6. David Holcman
  7. C. Steinhäuser
  8. Alexei Verkhratsky

Citations in the corpus