Predicting breast cancer survivability: a comparison of three data mining methods
By Dursun Delen, Glenn Walker, Amit Kadam. 2005
1,252 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cancer Research, Oncology
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Lars Juhl Jensen
- Keila Pena-Hernandez
- Chandan K. Reddy
- Peter Bjødstrup Jensen
- Dimitrios I. Fotiadis
- Dimitris J. Bertsimas
- Themis P. Exarchos
- Illhoi Yoo
In Cancer Research
- Sameer Quazi
- Fevzullah Temurtas
- Kwetishe Joro Danjuma
- David S. Wishart
- Hasan Temurtas
- Nejat Yumusak
- Joseph A. Cruz
In Oncology
- Allison O'Hair
- Dimitris J. Bertsimas
- Fevzullah Temurtas
- Kwetishe Joro Danjuma
- David S. Wishart
- Hasan Temurtas
- John Silberholz
- Nejat Yumusak
Citations in the corpus
- Applications of Machine Learning in Cancer Prediction and Prognosis (2006, methodology): “One of the challenges in using ANNs is mapping how the real-world input/output (an image, a physical characteristic, a list of gene names, a prognosis) can be mapped to a numeric vector.”
- Machine Learning for Survival Analysis (2019, background): “However, this will provide a suboptimal model because it neglects the information available in the censored instances (Delen et al. 2005; Burke et al. 1997).”
- Machine Learning for Survival Analysis: A Survey (2017, background): “However, it will provide a sub-optimal model because of neglecting the available information in those cen-XXX sored instances [Delen et al. 2005; Burke et al. 1997].”
- Artificial Intelligence Versus Clinicians in Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review (2019, background): “The development of diverse AI techniques also contributes to the prediction of breast cancer recurrence [6].”
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in precision and genomic medicine (2021, background): “Non-Omics Clinicopathological Neural Networks, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression Breast Cancer [122]”
- Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction (2014, background): “Based on biological knowledge, the authors selected gene pairs that indicate strong biological interactions.”
- Using methods from the data mining and machine learning literature for disease classification and prediction: A case study examining classification of heart failure sub-types (2013, result): “Although these two studies focused on disease incidence, a third study compared three methods for predicting survival in patients with breast cancer [36].”
- Credit Scoring, Statistical Techniques and Evaluation Criteria: A Review of the Literature (2011, background): “For further explanation of these stages, the reader is referred to Altman & Haldeman, (1995).”
- Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms in Post-operative Life Expectancy in the Lung Cancer Patients (2015, methodology): “The folds are stratified in a manner that they contain approximately the same proportion of predictor labels as the original dataset [12] and [14].”
- Data Mining in Healthcare and Biomedicine: A Survey of the Literature (2012, methodology): “Delen andcolleaguesbuilt prediction models usingartificial neural networks, decision trees (C5.0), and logistic regression to predict breast cancer survivability [ 33 ].”
- An Analytics Approach to Designing Combination Chemotherapy Regimens for Cancer (2016, methodology): “Most commonly, these prediction models are trained on individual patient records and used to predict the clinical outcome of an unseen patient, often yielding impressive out-of-sample predictions (Burke 1997, Delen et al. 2005, Lee et al. 2003, Hurria et al. 2011, Jefferson et al. 1997).”