Applications of Machine Learning in Cancer Prediction and Prognosis

By Joseph A. Cruz, David S. Wishart. Cancer Informatics, 2006

1,272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Machine learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that employs a variety of statistical, probabilistic and optimization techniques that allows computers to “learn” from past examples and to detect hard-to-discern patterns from large, noisy or complex data sets. This capability is particularly well-suited to medical applications, especially those that depend on complex proteomic and genomic measurements. As a result, machine learning is frequently used in cancer diagnosis and detection. More recently machine learning has been applied to cancer prognosis and prediction. This latter approach is particularly interesting as it is part of a growing trend towards personalized, predictive medicine. In assembling this review we conducted a broad survey of the different types of machine learning methods being used, the types of data being integrated and the performance of these methods in cancer prediction and prognosis. A number of trends are noted, including a growing dependence on protein biomarkers and microarray data, a strong bias towards applications in prostate and breast cancer, and a heavy reliance on “older” technologies such artificial neural networks (ANNs) instead of more recently developed or more easily interpretable machine learning methods. A number of published studies also appear to lack an appropriate level of validation or testing. Among the better designed and validated studies it is clear that machine learning methods can be used to substantially (15–25%) improve the accuracy of predicting cancer susceptibility, recurrence and mortality. At a more fundamental level, it is also evident that machine learning is also helping to improve our basic understanding of cancer development and progression.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Information Management, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8a0f17e0ee66ad5f50cd35932747e6a806ef03cf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Emma Brunskill
  2. Philip S. Thomas
  3. Bruno Castro da Silva
  4. Sergey Levine
  5. Andrew Barto
  6. Stephen Giguere
  7. Lihong Li
  8. Yuriy Brun

In Health Information Management

  1. Muhammad Bilal
  2. Ala Al-Fuqaha
  3. Chandan K. Reddy
  4. Zeeshan Ahmed
  5. Mohammed Ali Moni
  6. Dimitrios I. Fotiadis
  7. Themis P. Exarchos
  8. Junaid Qadir

In Molecular Biology

  1. Emma Brunskill
  2. Robert James Gillies
  3. Robert A. Gatenby
  4. Muhammad Bilal
  5. Ala Al-Fuqaha
  6. Philip S. Thomas
  7. Chandan K. Reddy
  8. Bruno Castro da Silva

Citations in the corpus