Phonological Abstraction in the Mental Lexicon

By James M. McQueen, Anne Cutler, Dennis Norris. Cognitive Sciences, 2006

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/569e9cf5e3e4e50816f4a278b2db4c9b2984ed53

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Language and Linguistics

Citations in the corpus

Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation (2011, background): “McQueen, Norris, and Cutler (2006) showed that the effect of perceptual learning was generalized to novel items which contained the target phoneme, suggesting the locus of the adjustment underlying the perceptual learning to be sublexical.”
Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review (2012, background): “This has led researchers to ask how much (if any) of those variations is encoded in our long-term memory and activated during lexical access, as opposed to being discarded early on in the signal-to-representations mapping process (eg, Goldinger, 1998 ; McQueen, Cutler, & Norris, 2006 ; Pisoni, 19”
Perceptual learning for speech (2009, unknown): “In subsequent studies ( McQueen, Cutler, & Norris, 2006; McQueen, Norris, & Cutler, 2006), the authors replicated the original Norris et al. (2003) finding using slightly different tasks at test and at exposure, respectively.”
Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel (2015, background): “However, simply storing raw episodes alone is not sufficient to explain the ways that human listeners generalize learning on one phonetic category to unheard words (Cutler, Eisner, McQueen, & Norris, 2010; McQueen et al., 2006), other contrasts (Kraljic & Samuel, 2006), and other talkers (Kraljic & ”
Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review (2010, background): “The adjusted categorisations then apply to tokens of the phoneme in any word, not just to the words already heard from that talker; so if an ambiguous sound between /f/ and /s/ has been heard in words like gira[f/s], it will be identified as that talker’s version of /f/, and if it is then presented ”