Workplace boredom coping: health, safety, and HR implications
By A. Game. 2007
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/567e1c807a312b3da10b411d0ee154273c487a70
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- Can job crafting reduce job boredom and increase work engagement? A three-year cross-lagged panel study (2016, unknown): “If organizational culture enables employees to constructively re fl ect upon and respond to their affective cues, such as early signals of boredom, they may automatically adapt their work behavior to improve their well-being (George, 2009; Game, 2007; Barbalet, 1999).”
- Understanding non-work presenteeism: Relationships between emotional intelligence, boredom, procrastination and job stress (2014, unknown): “In dealing with the boredom experienced at work, individuals may engage in non-work related strategies such as letter writing, reading, playing games, e-mailing, using the Internet, or smoking (D’Abate, 2005; Fisher, 1993; Game, 2007).”
- The good of boredom (2018, unknown): “That is, in order to alleviate boredom an individual might be motivated to change her situation or she might engage in a different mental activity, such as mind-wandering (Game, 2007; Harris, 2000; Martin et al., 2006).”
- The bored mind is a guiding mind: toward a regulatory theory of boredom (2018, background): “Furthermore, depending on the situation, there will be different strategies for dealing with boredom (Cummings et al., 2016; Daniels et al., 2015; Game, 2007).”