Alignment in disagreement: forming oppositional alliances in committee meetings

By Helena Kangasharju. 2002

97 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/565d2b3d4f8d26984adb0398b9bfc77e5d811f34

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. T. Nikko
2. Jan Svennevig
3. Birte Asmuß
4. Helena Kangasharju
5. A. Shirom

In Language and Linguistics

1. Jan Svennevig
2. T. Nikko
3. Birte Asmuß
4. Helena Kangasharju

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. T. Nikko
2. Jan Svennevig
3. Birte Asmuß
4. Helena Kangasharju
5. A. Shirom

Citations in the corpus

• Emotions in Organizations (2009, background): “What is specific about Extract 3 is that the participants are humorously aligning and teaming up (Kangasharju, 1998, 2002) against the chair (i.e., the chair is the target of the joke).”
• Meeting Talk (2009, background): “Kangasharju (2002) shows that alliances are usually formed after turns that call for disagreement, such as stance-taking utterances or proposals.”