Modelling non‐response in the National Child Development Study

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Academic self‐concept, gender and single‐sex schooling (2009, unknown): “However, Hawkes and Plewis’(2006) examination of attrition and non-response in the NCDS finds few significant predictors of attrition, wave non-response, and missing education data, thus supporting the assumption of ignorable non-response.”
Strategy for Modelling Nonrandom Missing Data Mechanisms in Observational Studies Using Bayesian Methods (2012, background): “…of the study), wave nonresponse (where an individual does not respond in a particular wave but reenters the study at a later stage) and attrition or drop-out (where an individual is permanently lost as the study proceeds), and these may have different characteristics (Hawkes and Plewis 2006).”
Single-Sex Schooling and Academic Attainment at School and Through the Lifecourse (2010, background): “Hawkes and Plewis’ (2006) examination of attrition and non-response in the NCDS finds few significant predictors of attrition, wave non-response, and missing education data, thus supporting the assumption of ignorable non-response.”
Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response (2009, background): “2 example, often report very high response rates many years after the original sample was drawn (e.g., Wadsworth et al., 2003; Hawkes and Plewis, 2006).”
Pathways between education and health: a causal modelling approach (2006, background): “Hawkes and Plewis (2006) analysed patterns of attrition among the NCDS cohort.”