Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.
By D. Stroup, J. Berlin, S. Morton, Ingram Olkin, G. Williamson, D. Rennie, D. Moher, B. Becker, T. Sipe, S. Thacker. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2000
6,633 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/55d00e994f20e69815d129a7134b9e4cfc0f7174
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Douglas G. Altman
- Lisa M. McShane
- David Moher
- K. F. Schulz
- C. Baglioni
- Dieter Riemann
- Willi Sauerbrei
- W. Hopkins
Citations in the corpus
- Is there an epidemic of child or adolescent depression? (2006, unknown): “Following recommendations for meta-analysis of observational studies (Stroup et al., 2000), we first identified epidemiologic studies of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders using Medline and PsycINFO, and through email messages to relevant professional societies.”
- Early Childhood Education: A Meta-Analytic Affirmation of the Short- and Long-Term Benefits of Educational Opportunity (2001, unknown): “…controlled and because some analysts have observed the effects of nonrandomized trials to be systematically larger than those of otherwise similar randomized trials, numerous caveats have been offered regarding the use of meta-analysis with nonrandomized trials (Petitti, 2000; Stroup et al., 2000).”
- Overweight and obesity in mothers and risk of preterm birth and low birth weight infants: systematic review and meta-analyses (2010, methodology): “We carried out a systematic review and meta-analyses in accordance with the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology consensus statement.”
- Quarterly Focus Issue: Prevention/OutcomesClinical Research: Cardiovascular RiskAnxiety and Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis (2010, methodology): “Methods for systematic identification, appraisal, synthesis and statistical aggregation of information, and reporting of results were chosen according to predetermined methods [17,18].”