Darkness visible: reflections on underground ecology

By A. Fitter. 2005

309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

1 Soil science and ecology have developed independently, making it difficult for ecologists to contribute to urgent current debates on the destruction of the global soil resource and its key role in the global carbon cycle. Soils are believed to be exceptionally biodiverse parts of ecosystems, a view confirmed by recent data from the UK Soil Biodiversity Programme at Sourhope, Scotland, where high diversity was a characteristic of small organisms, but not of larger ones. Explaining this difference requires knowledge that we currently lack about the basic biology and biogeography of micro‐organisms. 2 It seems inherently plausible that the high levels of biological diversity in soil play some part in determining the ability of soils to undertake ecosystem‐level processes, such as carbon and mineral cycling. However, we lack conceptual models to address this issue, and debate about the role of biodiversity in ecosystem processes has centred around the concept of functional redundancy, and has consequently been largely semantic. More precise construction of our experimental questions is needed to advance understanding. 3 These issues are well illustrated by the fungi that form arbuscular mycorrhizas, the Glomeromycota. This ancient symbiosis of plants and fungi is responsible for phosphate uptake in most land plants, and the phylum is generally held to be species‐poor and non‐specific, with most members readily colonizing any plant species. Molecular techniques have shown both those assumptions to be unsafe, raising questions about what factors have promoted diversification in these fungi. One source of this genetic diversity may be functional diversity. 4 Specificity of the mycorrhizal interaction between plants and fungi would have important ecosystem consequences. One example would be in the control of invasiveness in introduced plant species: surprisingly, naturalized plant species in Britain are disproportionately from mycorrhizal families, suggesting that these fungi may play a role in assisting invasion. 5 What emerges from an attempt to relate biodiversity and ecosystem processes in soil is our extraordinary ignorance about the organisms involved. There are fundamental questions that are now answerable with new techniques and sufficient will, such as how biodiverse are natural soils? Do microbes have biogeography? Are there rare or even endangered microbes?

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37c6e7e1bef6a338bb18d3c0b62d517d92ab3a9b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. W. H. van der Putten
  2. R. Bardgett
  3. T. Martijn Bezemer
  4. James D. Bever
  5. Matthias C. Rillig
  6. David A. Wardle
  7. M. Zobel
  8. Paul Kardol

In Insect Science

  1. M. Öpik
  2. M. Zobel
  3. M. Moora
  4. J. Young
  5. Sarah E. Smith
  6. Matthias C. Rillig
  7. R. Bardgett
  8. Baodong Chen

In Plant Science

  1. W. H. van der Putten
  2. M. Öpik
  3. Matthias C. Rillig
  4. F. Andrew Smith
  5. James D. Bever
  6. M. Zobel
  7. Sarah E. Smith
  8. R. Bardgett

Citations in the corpus