Distrust, race, and research.

By G. Corbie-Smith, Stephen B. Thomas, D. M. S. St. George. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2002

1,045 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm (2018, background): “Doing so supports the development of trust between researchers and participants, and such trust is especially important given the known history of exploitation in racial and ethnic minorities and intellectually disabled individuals (Carlson, 2013; Corbie-Smith et al., 2002; Yancey et al., 2006).”
Recruiting Transcultural Qualitative Research Participants: A Conceptual Model (2005, background): “When the researcher is a member of a group that has historically been an oppressor or colonizer of the potential participant group, then trust building is more complicated and difficult, and requires more time (Corbie-Smith et al., 2002; Lindenberg, Solorzano, Vilaro, & Westerbrook, 2001).”
Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. (2006, background): “, being treated as a “guinea pig,” were also reported (26, 27, 47, 96).”
Exploring Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials by Ethnicity (2017, methodology): “Distrust in doctors was measured using the distrust index scale [24].”
Are Racial and Ethnic Minorities Less Willing to Participate in Health Research? (2005, background): “Studies suggest that various factors, including historic abuses like the Tuskegee study, may have undermined minority groups’ trust in medical research, as measured by survey questions and focus groups [33,34].”