Ruminative coping and adjustment to bereavement.

By Susan Nolen-Hoeksema. 2001

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/551b0f517e6a5f615bfb6b6a9b5b43469c8b6c96

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Margaret Stroebe
2. Henk Schut
3. Wolfgang Stroebe
4. R. Neimeyer
5. Henk Aarts
6. C. Valentine
7. Millie Cordaro
8. G. V. Koningsbruggen

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. Margaret Stroebe
2. Henk Schut
3. Wolfgang Stroebe
4. R. Neimeyer

Citations in the corpus

• Attachment in Coping with Bereavement: A Theoretical Integration (2005, background): “…levels of psychopathology or ill health.3 People with an insecurely dependent orientation need first to confront their loss, not ruminatively (cf. Nolen-Hoeksema, 2001) but in a manner that will loosen their bond (which will include attending to restoration tasks) so that they too can learn to…”
• The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement: A Decade on (2010, methodology): “We drew on the work of Folkman (2001) on positive meaning states, and of Nolen-Hoeksema (2001) on negative appraisals to introduce cognitive pathways into the model.”