The Dual Process Model of Coping with Bereavement: A Decade on

By Margaret Stroebe, Henk Schut. Omega, 2010

755 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06f91e30f74ca8604a9c7852e6e2368abaff4ed6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. R. Neimeyer
2. Margaret Stroebe
3. Henk Schut
4. B. Litz
5. Alexander H. Jordan
6. Crystal L. Park
7. J. Gillies
8. Wolfgang Stroebe

In General Health Professions

1. R. Neimeyer
2. Margaret Stroebe
3. Henk Schut
4. Alexander H. Jordan
5. B. Litz
6. Crystal L. Park
7. J. Gillies
8. D. Larson

In Health

1. R. Neimeyer
2. Margaret Stroebe
3. Henk Schut

Citations in the corpus

• Meaning reconstruction in the wake of loss: Evolution of a research program. (2016, positive): “As a result, current concep-tualisations of grief involving dual processes of coping with the loss versus adapting to a changed life (Stroebe & Schut, 2010), reorganising ‘working models’ of attachment in the wake of a loved one’s death (Kosminsky & Jordan, 2016), and managing biopsychosocial…”
• Prolonged grief disorder: Diagnostic, assessment, and treatment considerations. (2014, background): “The therapy designed by Shear and colleagues (2005) included several components that encouraged patients to address the lossand the restoration-focused tasks of grieving (Stroebe & Schut, 1999).”
• Overload (2016, methodology): “We have described the DPM elsewhere (e.g., Stroebe & Schut, 1999, 2010), so only a brief overview will be given here.”