A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing

By M. Masson. Behavior Research Methods, 2011

773 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54bdb6bd642a5713140e617f432ea523ae11bf92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors (2014, methodology): “For a detailed review of how to calculate Bayes factors in ANOVA (and in particular, ANOVA in a within-subjects design), please refer to Masson (2011).”
Again, Knowledge of Common Source Fails to Promote Visual-Haptic Integration (2014, methodology): “A Bayesian analysis of the estimates quantifi ed the relative evidence favoring the eff ect absent (H 0 ) over the eff ect present (H 1 ) hypothesis, given the observed data [i.e., P BIC (H/D), see Masson, 2011 ].”
A Tutorial on Conducting and Interpreting a Bayesian ANOVA in JASP (2019, positive): “A series of recent articles show how the Bayesian framework can supplement or supplant the frequentist p-value (e.g, Burton, Gurrin, & Campbell, 1998; Dienes & McLatchie, 2018; Jarosz & Wiley, 2014; Masson, 2011; Nathoo & Masson, 2016; Rouder et al., 2016).”
A randomized controlled trial to test the effect of multispecies probiotics on cognitive reactivity to sad mood. (2015, methodology): “To calculate Bayesian probabilities we used the method proposed by Wagenmakers (2007) and Masson (2011).”
Bayesian alternatives to null-hypothesis significance testing for repeated-measures designs (2016, methodology): “As this result shows, the correct expression to be used in place of n in the first term of the BIC 10 formula is what was suggested by Masson (2011), namely, the number of subjects multiplied by one less than the number of repeated-measures conditions.”
Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does "failure to replicate" really mean? (2015, background): “Additional information on the BF is available in Masson (2011); Rouder et al. (2009) and Wagenmakers (2007).”
MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis (2012, methodology): “…probabilities for H 0 versus H 1 is poised to emerge as a widely used alternative to NHST in psychological research (e.g., Dienes, 2011; Kruschke, 2011; Masson, 2011; Raftery, 1995; Wagenmakers, 2007; Wetzels et al., 2011; see also Dixon, 2003; Glover & Dixon, 2004, for related alternatives).”