Error And The Growth Of Experimental Knowledge
By H. Freud. 2016
417 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/54bb3bf6e1587b08ad7806ac924c17f181867245
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Mark Rubin
- Martin Bichler
- Armin Heinzl
- Wil M.P. van der Aalst
- Zoltan Dienes
- Manfred Reichert
- Wil van der Aalst
- Bernd Weber
Citations in the corpus
- Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results (2014, background): “…has no basis in Bayesian inference (a point value always has 0 probability on a standard credibility interval); correspondingly, such a rule is sensitive to factors that are inferentially irrelevant such as the stopping rule and intentions of the experimenter (Mayo, 1996; Dienes, 2008, 2011).”
- Responsible Data Science (2017, background): “From an epistemological point of view, data-driven approaches follow the logic of the new experimentalism (Mayo 1996; Chalmers 2013) in which knowledge is derived from experimental observations, not theory.”
- When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress (2017, background): “Putting the arguments about relatedness (Leung, 2011) and test severity (Mayo, 1991, 1996) together, it can be concluded that a priori hypotheses may be omitted from a research article without any harm to science when they are (a) unrelated to the final conclusions of that article and (b) the…”